EDITORIAL:
Spiritual Growth
Someone said, I believe, something to the effect
that “the unexamined life isn’t worth living”. And so it is. Self-examination
has got to be an ongoing part of our lives, not merely a few moments each
week as we notice the bread and wine creeping towards us. As I come up to
40 years old, I can just about start to look back, as well as look forward.
In departure from my usual expositional style, I decided to share with you
what I understand by spiritual growth. For each life lived in Christ, it will
be somewhat different; but the essential processes are the same. The body
of believers will ultimately manifest the fullness of Christ, the glory of
God. I suggest this happens by each believer coming to reflect some particular
part of that glory. One may develop wonderful patience with others’ weaknesses;
another may develop faith in prayer for others’ illnesses. Between us, over
history, we finally reflect the full body and character of Jesus. And when
we’re done, He will come, as He finally sees His reflection here on earth.
The temple was laid out, like the tabernacle, as a man’s body (when seen from
a bird’s eye view); as if God’s intention was to look down upon His people
and see Himself reflected in them. The Lord Jesus looks down upon His people,
for all of them live unto Him in some sense, and wishes to see Himself reflected
in us.
I once did a Bible School, comparing the lives
of Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David, Samson, Job, Paul and Peter. I discerned
some common elements in their drive to spiritual maturity. Over their lives,
they all display an increasing appreciation of the Name of God; a growing
sense of the certainty of their salvation, as well as an ever finer conviction
of their own sinfulness; a deeper appreciation of God’s promises and the basic
doctrines of the Gospel; a marvel at grace; and an ever deeper Christ / Messiah
centredness.
The Way Of The Cross
It was the late, great Bro Jim Broughton who
gave me good advice in my teens. His recommendation was to try to imagine
the crucifixion of Jesus each time I broke bread, and each time to try to
realize some new insight into His sufferings and achievement. I’ve indeed
tried to do this, and I commend it. It’s been a factor in my growth. The margins
of my Bibles are full of scribbled notes around the chapters relating the
crucifixion. It’s midnight in Minsk as I write this. I’m still thinking of
the little insight I had last Sunday. It was a reflection on the observations
of many that what a man needs most as he dies… is not to face death alone.
To have someone with him. The way the Lord sent Mary and John away from Him
at the very end is profound in its reflection of His total selflessness, His
deep thought for others rather than Himself. It also reflects how He, more
than any other man, faced the ultimate human realities and issues which death
exposes. He met them totally alone, the supreme
example of human bravery in the face of death. And He faced them fully,
with no human cushion or literal or psychological anaesthesia to dilute the
awful, crushing reality of it. Remember how He refused the painkiller. And
through baptism and life in Him, we are asked to die with Him, to share something
of His death, the type and nature of death which He had... in our daily lives.
Little wonder we each seem to sense some essential, existential, quintessential…
loneliness in our souls. Thus it must be for those who share in His death.
I’m grateful to Cindy for a quote from a wise doctor: “What you can really
do for a person who is dying, is to die with him”. How inadvertently profound
that thought becomes when applied to the death of our Lord, and to us as we
imagine ourselves standing by and watching Him there. “What you can really
do for a person who is dying, is to die with him”.
The Way Of Personal Failure
Sin, both our own and the sins of others against
us, is actually used by God in a wonderful way. Not that this of course justifies
sin. But it is a fact that through our experience of the sin-repentance-forgiveness
process, we grow hugely. Here we have the answer
to those who cannot forgive themselves for past sins. God works out His plan
of salvation actually through man’s disobedience rather than his obedience.
As Paul puts it, we are concluded
in unbelief, that God may have mercy (Rom. 11:32). It was and is the spirit
of Joseph, when he comforted his brothers: “Now do not be distressed or angry
with yourselves because you sold me here; for God sent me before you to preserve
life” (Gen. 45:5). And again, speaking about the sin of Israel in rejecting
Christ: “Their trespass means riches for the [Gentile] world” (Rom. 11:12).
Or yet again, think of how Abraham’s lie about Sarah and unfaithfulness to
his marriage covenant with her became a source of God’s blessing and the curing
of Abimelech’s wife from infertility (Gen. 20:17). The righteousness
of God becomes available to us exactly because we have sinned and come short
of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23,24). If we lie, then through our lie the truth
and glory of God is revealed (Rom. 3:7). The light comes into the world -
the light of hope of salvation, forgiveness of God in Christ - but this light
reveals to us our verdict of ‘guilty’ (Jn. 3:18,36).
David was aware that God didn't really
want sacrifice, or else he would so eagerly have offered it (Ps. 51:16,17).
Instead, David perceived that what God wanted in essence was a broken and
contrite spirit. The Bathsheba incident was programmatic for David's understanding
of God, and his prayers and psalms subsequently can be expected to have constant
allusion back to it. We meet the same idea of God not ultimately wanting sacrifice
in Ps. 40:6-9: "Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire [but instead]
mine ears hast thou opened [Heb. 'digged'- a reference to a servant being
permanently committed as a slave to his master]: burnt offering and sin offering
hast thou not required. Then said I, Lo, I come... to do thy will... thy law
is within my heart". In Ps. 51:17, David had reasoned that instead of
sacrifice, God wanted a heart that was broken and contrite. Here he reflects
that instead of sacrifice, God wants a heart that has the law of God within
it. This ultimately is the effect of God's law being in our heart- it creates
a broken and contrite heart. But how? In the experience of most of us, the
law does this through convicting us of our inability to keep it. And so we
see how guilt and grace work so seamlessly together. David's broken heart
was a heart which knew he had sinned, sinned irreversibly, and condemned himself.
But this, he perceived, was the result of God's law being within his heart.
But the words of Ps. 40:6-9 are applied in the New Testament to the Lord's
death upon the cross. What's the connection, and what's the lesson? In essence,
through David's experience of sin, and the work of God's law upon his heart,
he came through that sin to have the very mind of the Lord Jesus as He hung
upon the cross, matchless and spotless in His perfection, as the Lamb for
sinners slain. Again and again we see the lesson taught- that God works through
human sin, in this case, in order to bring us to know the very mind of Christ
in His finest hour of glory and spiritual conquest. We must not only let God's
word work its way in us; but we need to recognize when dealing with other
sinners that God likewise is working with them. He doesn't shrug and walk
away from sin; He earnestly seeks to use our experience of it to bring us
closer unto Himself.
I’ve often asked myself how exactly
the Mosaic Law led people to Christ. Was it not that they were convicted by it of guilt, and
cried out for a Saviour? “The law entered, that the offence might abound.
But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: that… grace might reign…
unto eternal life by Jesus” (Rom. 5:20,21). This was the purpose of the Law.
And thus Paul quotes David’s rejoicing in the righteousness imputed to him
when he had sinned and had no works left to do - and changes the pronoun from
“he” to “they” (Rom. 4:6-8). David’s personal experience became typical of
that of each of us. It was through the experience of that wretched
and hopeless position that David and all believers come to know the true ‘blessedness’
of imputed righteousness and sin forgiven by grace. The suffering and groaning
of which Paul speaks in Rom. 8:17, 22-26 is in my view, probably a reference to the ‘groaning’
he has just been making about his inability to keep the Mosaic Law. Our helplessness
to be obedient, our frustration with ourselves, is a groaning against sin
which is actually a groaning in harmony with that of the Spirit of the Lord
Jesus, who makes intercession for us with the same groanings right now (Rom.
8:26). Indeed, those groanings are those spoken of in Heb. 5:7 as the groanings
of strong crying and tears which the Lord made in His final passion. In this
sense, the Spirit, the Lord the Spirit, bears witness with our spirit / mind,
that we are the children of God (Rom. 8:16). This clinches all I am trying
to say. Our inability to keep the Law of God leads to a groaning against sin
and because of sin, which puts us into a unity with the Lord Jesus as our
Heavenly intercessor in the court of Heaven. But that wondrous realization
of grace which is expressed so finely in Romans 8 would just be impossible
were it not for the conviction of sin which there is through our experience
of our inability to keep the Law of God. Our failure and groaning because
of it becomes in the end the very witness that we are the children of God
(Rom. 8:16). God thereby makes sin His servant, in that the experience of
it glorifies Him.
And then there’s intellectual failure:
the way we misunderstood Scripture, had wrong ideas which, over the
years of prayerful Bible study, are being corrected. But my observation
is that what I’m calling intellectual failure- e.g. a Bible reader
believing in the immortality of the soul - usually has a moral reason
behind it, subconsciously. We so often wilfully read Scripture the way we secretly want to understand it, willing
ourselves to the same conclusions as our fathers. Prayer before daily
Bible reading is essential; but it must be genuine prayer, an utterly
sincere desire to be taught the way of God whatever this requires us
to jettison.
The Way Of Preaching
The experience of preaching leads to our growth.
Paul Tournier in The Meaning Of Persons perceptively
comments: “We become fully conscious only of what we are able to express to
someone else. We may already have had a certain intuition about it, but it
must remain vague so long as it is unformulated”. This is why anyone involved in preaching,
public speaking, writing or personal explanation of the Gospel to someone
else will know that they have gained so much from having stated in so many
words what they already ‘know’. And in the course of making the expression,
our own understanding is deepened, our personal consciousness of what we believe
is strengthened, and thereby our potential for a real faith is enhanced. Tournier’s
observation is validated by considering the record of the healed blind man
in Jn. 9. Initially he says that he doesn’t know whether or not Jesus is a
sinner, all he knows is that Jesus healed him. But the Jews force him to testify
further, and in the course of his witness, the man explains to them that God
doesn’t hear sinners, and so for Jesus to have asked God for his healing and
being heard…surely proved that Jesus wasn’t a sinner.
He was sinless. The man was as it were thinking out loud, coming to conclusions
himself, as he made his bold witness (Jn. 9:31,33).
The parable of the sower leaves us begging
the question: ‘So how can we be good ground?’ Mark’s record goes straight
on to record that the Lord right then said that a candle is lit so as to publicly
give light and not to be hidden. He is speaking of how our conversion is in
order to witness to others. But He says this in the context of being good
ground. To respond to the word ourselves, our light must be spreading to all.
The only way for the candle of our faith to burn is for it to be out in the
open air. Hidden under the bucket of embarrassment or shyness or an inconsistent
life, it will go out. We will lose our faith if we don’t in some sense witness
to it. Witnessing is, in that sense, for our benefit. When the disciples ask
however they can accomplish the standards which the Lord set them, He replied
by saying that a city set on a hill cannot be hid (Mt. 5:14). He meant that
the open exhibition of the Truth by us will help us in the life of personal
obedience to Him.
Discussing Scripture with others has been invaluable
in my own experience of Bible study. Particularly is it valuable to discuss
with Christians and even non-believers who come from a totally different culture
from your own. Thus discussion of the parables of the lost in Lk. 15 with
Middle Eastern peasants raises a number of issues which few Western expositors
have hit on- e.g. the ways in which the elder son's refusal to attend the
banquet was such an insult to the father; the way an older man never runs
in public and humiliates himself by doing so. The problem is, we come to Scripture
through the lenses of our own culture and background. Leslie Newbigin, a lifetime
missionary in India, commented: "We do not see the lenses of our spectacles;
we see through them, and it is another who has to say to us, ‘Friend, you
need a new pair of spectacles’"(1). Newbigin had some thing of
my own experience of the value of discussing Scripture with people from other
backgrounds; he speaks of the need of "the witness of those who read
the Bible with minds shaped by other cultures"(2). This is not only true
in a world-culture sense but it is helpful to discuss with all manner of folk.
Even though we may not agree with them, an hour spent in discussing Revelation
with a JW, or Paul with a radical Christian feminist who thinks Jesus is a
woman... all this sows stimulation in our subsequent reflections.
More than anything, preaching has taught me the immense value
of the human person as an individual. The Lord’s parable of the strange shepherd
who leaves the 99 and gives his all for the one - the foolish one, the lost
one, the antisocial one - is programmatic for me. The need is the call. If
one person needs fellowship, forgiveness, love, the teaching of the Gospel,
baptism, encouragement, re-fellowship, support, money, whatever… the value
of them as an individual must be paramount. No matter what it costs us, how
far we have to travel [in whatever sense], how much ‘trouble’ we get into,
how foolish we look, how out on a limb we put ourselves. The value and meaning
of the individual person was paramount in the Lord’s teaching and example,
and it must be in our worldviews too.
John Thomas wrote at the end of his life
about his regret for the “theological gladiatorship” of his earlier years.
Likewise, looking back, I see that, initially, I understood 'preaching' as merely
debating and combating theological ideas opposed to my own - with no significance
placed upon the value of the person with whom I was in discussion. It’s not that
I think the doctrines of our faith are any less important now than I did then.
Actually, the opposite. It’s just that that person on the other side of the fence to
you has, just like you, their inner traumas and struggles, their secret conflicts
and dramas... and yet all this becomes hidden behind the facade of doctrinal
debate and argument. I’ve learnt that it is to the person we must appeal if we are to
win them for Christ, or win them closer to Him as we seek. If we are to convert
and help others to Jesus, rather than to ourselves, we need to find "another
mode of relationship" than mere intellectual argument. Such argument
alone will not convert or persuade towards the cause of Christ. And yet, sadly,
so much of our collective preaching effort has been taken up with exactly
this kind of fruitless debate. Doctrinal argument tends to divide; whereas
it is the common areas of experience which tend to unite. And so a woman reaching
out to other women, perhaps other young mothers, will be a far more likely
case for conversion than knocking on the doors and engaging all and sundry
in doctrinal debate. But that woman, if she is to bring about an authentic
conversion, must all the same convert her fellow-woman to something. And she
likely will have to talk around all the host of misunderstandings and wrong
ideas which her friend has been exposed to in this sadly confused and lost
world.
The Way Of Biblical Study
Daily Bible reading from the Companion
has been a blessing to me. And pray, fervently and intensely, to really understand
and respond; that the word may become flesh in us, as it was in the Lord.
I can’t recommend these habits strongly enough. Through all the ups and downs,
failure and success, sin and righteousness, the light and the black, and all
the shades of grey, this is a habit I have rigidly kept up. And of course,
serious prayer. I am grateful, and maybe in a literal sense it will be ‘eternally
grateful’, that my dear mother taught me to pray on my knees as a little boy.
Little could she have imagined what she was doing for me by setting me up
in that way from which I would not depart. How in sin, in danger of my life,
under arrest by Moslem fanatics, in rejection, in adulation, alone in so many
lonely hotel rooms in the service of the Gospel... serious prayer on my knees
was my salvation. Who am I to really give advice?... but all I can say is:
pray to God, and hear His voice in His word, daily, seriously, intently. And
develop habits that enable this. Set your alarm clock just 10 minutes earlier,
or whatever is required.
The Way Of Grace
That salvation is indeed a pure gift from
God, unattainable by our own efforts, becomes more and more clear and awesome
to me. But His grace works out in other ways, apart from in our salvation.
So many times I have been saved from death or serious injury by grace. It
is grace that we have what health we have, life itself. Grace that we were
born into a situation whereby in the end we heard the Gospel. It was God’s
grace that gave me wonderful parents and the finest wife, that preserved me
in ways great and small time and again. And you must surely know the same
sense of grace.
Realizing that we are in the grace of God,
justified by Him through our being in Christ, leads us to a far greater and
happier acceptance of ourselves as persons. So many people are unhappy with
themselves. It’s why they look in mirrors in a certain way when nobody else is watching; why
they’re so concerned
to see how they turned out in
a photograph. Increasingly, this graceless world can’t accept itself. People
aren’t happy or acceptant of their age [they want to look younger or older],
their body, their family situation, even their gender and their own basic
personality. I found that when I truly accepted my salvation by grace, when
the wonder of who I am in God’s sight, as a man in Christ, really dawned on
me, I became far happier with
myself, far more acceptant. Now of course in another sense, we are called
to radical transformation, to change, to rise above the narrow limits of our
own backgrounds. This is indeed the call of Christ. But I refer to our acceptance
of who we are, and the situations we are in, as basic human beings.
Duncan Heaster